So, I’m summing up the indictment, with a sentence from a paragraph here and a sentence from the following paragraph, and I don’t change much of the text (for instance, in the first panel, after “pool” there’s “and a patio”). Between the text used in the previous strip and this one, Jack Smith sums up two conversations that appear as a dialogue later in the indictment. Then he mentions the co-defendant Waltine Nauta in a paragraph, and then the next bit is this one, about Mar-A-Lago. Well, the previous strip was about Mar-A-Lago. I want to highlight the conversation as it is and not just the quote, and I figured that jumping three or four paragraphs to more information about Mar-A-Lago would continue the flow. It’s my attempt at making something of a story here, and not just the gags. Though this page is a bunch of gags.

I can’t believe no one at the Secret Service knew what he was up to. They have to have witnessed a lot of crimes by this guy and his family. But, unlike the whistleblower in the Zelensky call, are they authorized to rat him out? They’ve already deleted texts and data from standing around him during January 6th. I mean, obviously in panel 4 he’s NOT going to blab to them (or did he?), but, what can they do? The other job the Secret Service has is…investigating counterfeiting.

Anyway, thanks for reading. Happy Monday.